I. Rhetorical Overview of the Article
1. What is the author's exigence? Why
does the author feel the article/argument needs to be made?
A: Hooks exigence is that writing an
autobiography is a more difficult task then it may seem. She realizes that accuracy
with detail is less important than writing down how you feel in from situation
to situation.
2a. What discourse community is the author speaking toward for the
article? WHY do you think that?
2b. If you are not the intended
audience, or outside of the discourse community, for this article, what would
the author need to change to make you the primary audience?
A: The discourse community Hook is
speaking to in her article is anyone who is interested or is currently in
writing an autobiography. She explains
the process for that she went through to write her own autobiography.
3. What is the author's
thesis/argument/niche for the piece? If possible, quote
specifically from the text
Thesis: "Until I began to try and
write my autobiography, I thought that it would be a simple task, this telling
of one's story. And yet it tried year after year, never writing more than a few
pages."
II. Summary
1. Write a few sentences that
summarizes this article in your own words; make sure to cover the main
arguments AND conclusions.
In her article, "Writing
Autobiography," Bell Hook talks about the process she used while trying to
write her own autobiography. Hook grew up in a broken household and found that
writing about her life and her past helped her deal with the problems she had
in the past. She also described the difficulties that come along when writing
an autobiography.
2. Take the summary you just wrote and
condense it into something “tweetable,” by which I mean a summary that is NO
longer than 140 characters. Consider using the same conventions you would if
tweeting, meaning abbreviations and informality in language.
Tweet: Find ways to forget the past and
starting writing your future.
3. What hashtags (#) would you use for
this article? Stated otherwise, what key terms would you provide to describe
the content of this article?
#emotions #writing #difficulties #autobiography
III. Burkean Parlor/Intertextuality
1. In what ways does this author and/or
the ideas in this article connect with, (dis)agree with, speak to or against –I
think you get the gist– previous authors and their ideas that we have
encountered in this class?
Hooks article is similar to Lamott's
idea that although it may be difficult to write a paper at first you just need
to find the right strategy and mindset to help ease the process.
Assigned
Exercises
1. What does hook mean when she
says she wants to "kill" herself through her writing?
A: What Hook is talking about when she
says she wants to kill herself through her writing is because it brought back
and opened up wounds from her past. With the pain though came a healing process
that she discovered through writing
2. Bell Hooks changed her name from
Gloria Jean Watkins, essentially changing her identity with it. Can identity be
something we can change through text? How can we achieve this?
A: You can change your identity completely
when writing. Many people write in ways that does not reflect their personality
one bit. This is why many people find writing so entertaining because you can
be someone else.
IV. Personal Reflection
1. How can you apply the information in
this article to your own writing process? First, consider the main ideas
that the author addresses, then consider other elements, such as organization,
style, etc.
I personally didn’t take much out of
this article because I don’t plan on writing an autobiography any time in the
near future. But I did find the story very touching about her past and how
writing has changed her life.
2. What is confusing about the article?
What questions do you have after reading the article?
I think this article was easy to
understand it just didn’t relate with me.
No comments:
Post a Comment