I. Summary
Lisa Delpit’s article, “The Politics of Teaching Literate
Discourse”, is all about the different types of discourse, mainly primary and
secondary discourse. This article of is mainly to disprove James Paul
Gee’s theory on primary and secondary and his ideas of being involved in a discourse
community. It talks about planning on
not getting in a discourse community if you are already in a DC because you
will have many problems change discourses in the future. She gives many
examples of black people that did not have a primary DC that were successful in
life. She says that these people would not have had the opportunities
they had if the teachers had Gee’s mind set about discourse communities.
II. Dialectic
Notebook
|
In
this column you RESPOND to the quotes
|
In
this column you TYPE OUT the quote
|
|
This quote relates to Gee’s article in many ways.
The first discourse we learn is the most influential discourse in our lives.
It always says that switching communities can be difficult.
|
"Gee maintains that there are primary discourse, those
learned in the home, and secondary discourses, which are attached to
institutions or groups one might later encounter".
|
|
This quote introduces Delpit’s main argument against Gee. Once
you are in a discourse community is very hard to get into another discourse
community without complicating terms with the other discourse community. The
individual is born into a discourse community, and changing is a difficult
thing to do.
|
"The status of individuals born into a particular
discourse tends to be maintained because primary discourses are related to
secondary discourses of similar status in our society".
|
|
Delpit gives advice to what teachers should do to students who
have a different home discourse and literacy. She says that if they are
not well educated about this than they will not be successful in college.
|
"First, teachers must acknowledge and validate students'
home language without using it to limit students' potential"
|
|
This quote is important in it demonstrates Delpits claims. She
talks about a man named Clarence Cunningham was a very good football player
in high school but only had a C average. The teachers seeing his
potential made him work harder on his schoolwork or else he was not allowed
to play football anymore. The teachers were his biggest influence.
|
“Clarence Cunningham, now a vice chancellor at the largest
historically black institution in the United States, grew up in a painfully poor
community in rural Illinois”
|
|
This quote really shows what teachers should do for students
that come from backgrounds that are not as great as other students.
Delpit then says that teachers can discuss openly the injustices of allowing
certain people to succeed based not a talent but what your last name
is. This quote was very propionate around the time college applying
began. You already who was getting what before the even applied.
|
“A final role that teachers can take is to acknowledge the
unfair “discourse-stacking” that our society engages in.”
|
|
Delpit is wanting to fight the oppressed people and get them
the an education that everyone should get. This quote really shows that
people should change so that people of a poor background can have the same
opportunities as a person that is rich.
|
“Individuals can learn the “superficial features” of dominant
discourses, as well as their more subtle aspects.”
|
.
No comments:
Post a Comment