I.
Mapping/Charting the Argument
Scientists and doctors have been looking at autism and what causes this
disorder for many years especially recently. It is a disorder that causes one
to be socially awkward and different than the rest of society. Scientist really
cannot find out why autism affects the brain and ones behavior like it does.
What they do know is that autistic people use different parts of their brains
while processing information that “normal” people do. With the lack of scientific knowledge therefore there is no way
to discuss this topic without using rhetorical arguments.
IIa.
Connections
This article
connects with Gee, Swales, and Wardle in which all the articles talk about
discourse communities. Autistic people can be seen as a discourse community
because they all have the same disorder and their s specific language and terms
that other people would not understand unless they were experts on autism or
they themselves had autism.
IIb. Project
3
This article
represents and talks about a type of discourse community and the research that
most be done in order to classify a group of people as a discourse community.
Much like in my project I am doing research as to why my hockey team is a
discourse community. So this article very much relates to the research that I
am going to be doing except I will be studying my hockey team, not autistic
people.
III.
Problematic/Necessary Terms
Critical mass: the amount you need to achieve what
needs to be done.
Rhetorical analysis: analyzing subjects and
concepts in rhetorical ways of practicing and thinking.
Rhetoric: what most have in common is the
language use in the social area and the role of communication and interaction
within it. Or, being in the world through language, through invention, structure,
and style.
Topoi: a convention or motif.
“Types of rhetoric”: judicial, epideictic,
deliberative
Rhetorical listening: The practice that urges us to
fundamentally alter how we hear and response to discourses of others.
Echolalia: an uncontrollable and immediate
repetition of worlds spoken by another.
Relativistic empathy: dependence upon some variable
factor such as the psychological, social, or environmental context.
IV.
Activities/Discussion
To talk about autism and how it can be seen as a discourse
community, also to show how convincing people doesn’t also have to be shown by
using data and concrete facts
No comments:
Post a Comment